The goal of these guidelines is to improve developer productivity by allowing developers to jump any file in the codebase and not need to adapt to inconsistencies in how the code is written. The codebase should appear as if it had been authored by a single developer. If you don't agree with a convention, submit a PR patching this document and let's discuss! Once the PR is accepted, all code should be updated as soon as possible to reflect the new conventions.
-
All Rust code is formatted using the latest version of
rustfmt
. Once installed, it will be updated automatically when you update the compiler withrustup
. -
All Rust code is linted with Clippy. If you'd prefer to ignore its advice, do so explicitly:
#[allow(clippy::too_many_arguments)]
Note: Clippy defaults can be overridden in the top-level file
.clippy.toml
. -
For variable names, when in doubt, spell it out. The mapping from type names to variable names is to lowercase the type name, putting an underscore before each capital letter. Variable names should not be abbreviated unless being used as closure arguments and the brevity improves readability. When a function has multiple instances of the same type, qualify each with a prefix and underscore (i.e. alice_keypair) or a numeric suffix (i.e. tx0).
-
For function and method names, use
<verb>_<subject>
. For unit tests, that verb should always betest
and for benchmarks the verb should always bebench
. Avoid namespacing function names with some arbitrary word. Avoid abbreviating words in function names. -
As they say, "When in Rome, do as the Romans do." A good patch should acknowledge the coding conventions of the code that surrounds it, even in the case where that code has not yet been updated to meet the conventions described here.
Inventing new terms is allowed, but should only be done when the term is widely used and understood. Avoid introducing new 3-letter terms, which can be confused with 3-letter acronyms.
Solana's architecture is described by a book generated from markdown files in
the book/src/
directory, maintained by an editor (currently @garious). To
change the architecture, you'll need to at least propose a change the content
under the Proposed
Changes chapter. Here's
the full process:
- Propose to a change to the architecture by creating a PR that adds a
markdown document to the directory
book/src/
and references it from the table of contents. Add the editor and any relevant maintainers to the PR review. - The PR being merged indicates your proposed change was accepted and that the editor and maintainers support your plan of attack.
- Submit PRs that implement the proposal. When the implementation reveals the need for tweaks to the architecture, be sure to update the proposal and have that change reviewed by the same people as in step 1.
- Once the implementation is complete, the editor will then work to integrate the document into the book.