Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AdaGram not working with new versions of Julia? #37

Open
sadov-m opened this issue Feb 8, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

AdaGram not working with new versions of Julia? #37

sadov-m opened this issue Feb 8, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@sadov-m
Copy link

sadov-m commented Feb 8, 2019

I tried building AdaGram on Julia v 1.1 and it seems that there might be some incompatibilities. This is what I am getting while trying to clone AdaGram using Pkg:

julia> Pkg.clone("https://github.com/sbos/AdaGram.jl.git") ┌ Warning: Pkg.clone is only kept for legacy CI script reasons, please use add└ @ Pkg.API /builddir/build/BUILD/julia/build/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.1/Pkg/src/API.jl:386 Updating registry at~/.julia/registries/GeneralUpdating git-repohttps://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General.git`
Updating git-repo https://github.com/sbos/AdaGram.jl.git
[ Info: Assigning UUID 3697d9a4-0c04-5c6c-a718-eefb7df45f8e to AdaGram
[ Info: Path /home/sadm/.julia/dev/AdaGram exists and looks like the correct package, using existing path
Resolving package versions...
ERROR: Unsatisfiable requirements detected for package Devectorize [03c08e68]:
Devectorize [03c08e68] log:
├─possible versions are: [0.2.0-0.2.1, 0.3.0, 0.4.0-0.4.2] or uninstalled
├─restricted to versions 0.0.0-* by AdaGram [3697d9a4], leaving only versions [0.2.0-0.2.1, 0.3.0, 0.4.0-0.4.2]
│ └─AdaGram [3697d9a4] log:
│ ├─possible versions are: 0.0.0 or uninstalled
│ └─AdaGram [3697d9a4] is fixed to version 0.0.0
└─restricted by julia compatibility requirements to versions: uninstalled — no versions left
`

Could you please specify which Julia versions I should use to make AdaGram work?

@Dznan
Copy link

Dznan commented Nov 19, 2019

v0.4 is what you need and It works well in Linux.

@sbos
Copy link
Owner

sbos commented Nov 20, 2019

Hooray! I know it's very hard to believe, but I have ported AdaGram to v1.1 this summer. It has been reported to perform weirdly under v1.2, but maybe some kind soul can look into this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants