-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: classifier accuracy #8
Comments
Test script added, and some outputs from one run (the model predictions aren't deterministic) terrible performance '(
|
Accuracy evaluation over all 51K images of the train set highlights a clear model problem. (see results below. Our accuracy is heterogenous across species but we do not have the same specie predispositions as can be found in the original paper presenting the model. (https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.14167 Figure 6) We think this is coming from the image preprocessing which is carried out before model classification (as this part was adapted from the WhaleDataset object from the original repository. ![]() ![]() |
After comparison of the preprocessing on the current classifier (cetacean-classifier in Saving-Willy Hugging Face space) to the one performed in the WhaleDataset object from the original repository, we will explore the following: Next steps:
First, we will see the transforms on one image and decide which are beneficial. Then, we will test on a subset of 100 images of the training set to see if accuracy is enhanced. |
The classifier currently has issues in its predictions. They do not match the ones stated in its article. Further investigations are needed to understand this accuracy drop.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: