You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My use case is a bit different than in #637 but I think the solution could be the same.
Basically I want to run command "foo", "bar", and "baz {A} {B} {C}" with parameters A, B, C. Currently "foo" and "bar" are run once for each combination of A, B, and C, which is inefficient and clutters the output. Instead, "foo" and "bar" should run only once each.
It could be done either by, after expanding all combinations, deduplicating commands (but then showing parameters is harder); or detecting which subset of parameter/scans each command takes and computing only the relevant combinations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My use case is a bit different than in #637 but I think the solution could be the same.
Basically I want to run command "foo", "bar", and "baz {A} {B} {C}" with parameters A, B, C. Currently "foo" and "bar" are run once for each combination of A, B, and C, which is inefficient and clutters the output. Instead, "foo" and "bar" should run only once each.
It could be done either by, after expanding all combinations, deduplicating commands (but then showing parameters is harder); or detecting which subset of parameter/scans each command takes and computing only the relevant combinations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: