Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failure with SBCL 1.3.14 x86-64 #5

Closed
glv2 opened this issue Sep 10, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Failure with SBCL 1.3.14 x86-64 #5

glv2 opened this issue Sep 10, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@glv2
Copy link
Contributor

glv2 commented Sep 10, 2018

The changes in commit 8111b88 don't work well with SBCL 1.3.14 x86-64 (the version currently used by Debian stable).

Some tests fail, and some functions of other libraries using nibbles fail to compile.

Example with Ironclad:

; compiling (DEFUN XOR-BLOCK ...)
debugger invoked on a SB-INT:SIMPLE-PROGRAM-ERROR in thread
#<THREAD "main thread" RUNNING {1001E065E3}>:
  invalid number of arguments: 5

Type HELP for debugger help, or (SB-EXT:EXIT) to exit from SBCL.

restarts (invokable by number or by possibly-abbreviated name):
  0: [RETRY] Retry compiling #<IRONCLAD-SOURCE-FILE "ironclad" "src" "common">.
  1: [ACCEPT] Continue, treating compiling #<IRONCLAD-SOURCE-FILE "ironclad" "src" "common"> as having been successful.
  2: Retry ASDF operation.
  3: [CLEAR-CONFIGURATION-AND-RETRY] Retry ASDF operation after resetting the configuration.
  4: [ABORT] Exit debugger, returning to top level.

(SB-X86-64-ASM::|movzx| #<SB-ASSEM:SEGMENT :TYPE :REGULAR> #<SB-C::VOP :INFO UB32REF/LE :ARGS #<SB-C:TN-REF :TN #<SB-C:TN INPUT-BLOCK1!1[RDI]> :WRITE-P NIL :VOP UB32REF/LE> :RESULTS #<SB-C:TN-REF :TN #<SB-C:TN t2[RDX]> :WRITE-P T :VOP UB32REF/LE>> (:DWORD :QWORD) #<SB-C:TN t2[RDX]> #<SB-X86-64-ASM::EA :DWORD base=#<SB-C:TN INPUT-BLOCK1!1[RDI]> index=#<SB-C:TN t3[RDX]> disp=1>) [tl,external]
0]
@jonatack
Copy link

I'm seeing the same issue. PR #6 fixes it for me as well (thank you @glv2).

@defunkydrummer
Copy link

defunkydrummer commented Feb 6, 2019

FYI - PR #6 didn't work for SBCL 1.3.10 on x64-windows, so such old version of SBCL would need to be upgraded.

@brown brown closed this as completed Feb 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants