You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be great if it were possible to use HTF with literate Haskell. I don't think it is at the moment, for at least one reason: htfpp does not appear to recognise LHS input (nor can it be told via command line option) and so does not detect the test_*/prop_* functions definitions and generates regular Haskell for _thisModulesTests etc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bird-style LHS is what I tried first and what doesn't work as described above: using Tex-style LHS works much better: htfpp can correctly read the input Haskell and generates a valid _thisModulesTest etc but does not wrap them in \begin{code}/\end{code}. I suspect that would be an easy feature to add for the most minimal of LHS support.
It would be great if it were possible to use HTF with literate Haskell. I don't think it is at the moment, for at least one reason: htfpp does not appear to recognise LHS input (nor can it be told via command line option) and so does not detect the
test_*
/prop_*
functions definitions and generates regular Haskell for_thisModulesTests
etcThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: