GraphQL #55
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
Our |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'll second @thetarnav comments on this. This primitive came from a very humble origins, ported from a core community members package. I personally will be working on a number of GQL oriented services on my next Solid project so there will likely be an opportunity to improve it. It's funny that you mention SSE and WS because I'll have needs for that specifically. GQty is a really neat approach but our primitives will only ever focus on the mechanic for handling GQL requests and responses within a reactive context. This might mean that we'll expand the primitives to do slightly more, perhaps I can add an SSE and WS option too. We have other primitives that can support that. The goal for these primitives are to be foundational and highly composable. What we wont do is adopt a pattern like GQty however, we are strongly considering creating a segment of Solid Primitives for vendor integrations. We might call it Solid Integrations where we can house and maintain Solid enabled adapters for projects like urql, GQty and others. If you're interested in helping out definitely let us know! The point here is we want Solid Primitives to be more about the tools and Solid Integrations for the more opinionated parts. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Can we use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I just saw the
@solid-primitives/graphql
I'll test it out soonBut is it http only?
Does it support subscriptions? SSE? ws?
I also like this approach GQty for writing queries instead of the using strings
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions