-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
High CPU load after MQTT connection lost #443
Comments
Do you observe this issue without rules or can you provide a minimal working example that shows that behavior? |
I tried to reproduce that behavior but did not succeed so far. But I can say that I've seen it already several times. Here is an example, what my rules do: the just publish sometimes some data to the main server. There are four rules which do similar things. There is one rule which sends data with a higher frequency, but that was deactivated when that problem occurred. The configuration is nothing special:
|
HABApp Version 24.02.0 I confirm the problem, but I also can’t reproduce it, since it manifests itself over time.
|
I've just published |
If the MQTT connection is lost, the CPU load increases a lot. Even if connection is restored, the high load remains.
It needs to restart HABApp to drop the level again.
HABApp Version 24.02.0
OpenHAB version 4.1.1 (Release Build)
Please not that the data shown in the graph is transferred over that MQTT connection, so there is a gap while the connection is lost.
![grafik](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/37875289/316313431-bd6f5465-8dcc-4e35-8f4e-2ee319f5befe.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.sHqSkXJ7GwKJIMh08bJlYrFJUKTUf8liIrmlUIRJyFI)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: