Batch Edit: Catalog Number format validation does not follow COType's formatter

[sharadsw]

Found in #5417

From @combs-a:

Also, I tried out COs that use COTs with the AlphaNumByYear type, and batch edit flagged the correct format as invalid, and incorrect formats as valid. Is fixing this within the scope of the PR? Wanted to check since the same thing works fine in the Workbench.

The incorrect format is AAAAAA, which was the default catno format before I changed it for FunnyTurtles.

This happens because when relationships are disabled, validation for the formatter falls back to using the collection's default numeric formatter. This can be fixed by enabling relationships so that validation uses the correct formatter