Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explore adding pyspedas interface to spacepy IRBEM implementation. #1016

Open
jameswilburlewis opened this issue Sep 19, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
analysis Issues pertaining to general purpose analysis tools enhancement New feature or request geopack Field modeling, field line tracing, special coordinate transforms, etc refactoring

Comments

@jameswilburlewis
Copy link
Contributor

jameswilburlewis commented Sep 19, 2024

spacepy apparently includes support for several field models, including some of the Tsyganenko models, under its IRBEMPY module:

https://spacepy.github.io/autosummary/spacepy.irbempy.get_Bfield.html#spacepy.irbempy.get_Bfield

It sounds like these are compiled Fortran libraries, so they might be a lot more efficient than geopack, at least for the models supported by IRBEM. We would need to vet them against the IDL geopack results, of course...

@jameswilburlewis jameswilburlewis added enhancement New feature or request refactoring geopack Field modeling, field line tracing, special coordinate transforms, etc analysis Issues pertaining to general purpose analysis tools labels Sep 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
analysis Issues pertaining to general purpose analysis tools enhancement New feature or request geopack Field modeling, field line tracing, special coordinate transforms, etc refactoring
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant