You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The measures used from Mendez: Segment length at dorsal column entry
To bring the spinal level positioning in the PAM50 space, linear scaling between length of Mendez and the length of pixels between C2 and L5 in the PAM50 was done.
However, the spinal segments length doesn't vary linearly along the spinal cord. Using the length between C2-L5 won't necessarly be accurate for all levels to get the position in the PAM50 space.
New spinal segment positions vs before on PAM50
Here are the different positions of the center of each segment with the updated spinal levels vs before:
Level
Mendez (Slices in I-->S)
Old (Slices in I-->S)
Difference
C2
954
945
9
C3
927
927
0
C4
899
891
8
C5
868
857
11
C6
839
826
13
C7
812
794
18
C8
787
757
30
T1
760
713
47
T2
729
668
61
T3
695
622
73
T4
655
572
83
T5
608
522
86
T6
558
471
87
T7
507
417
90
T8
454
365
89
T9
403
310
93
T10
351
251
100
T11
301
194
107
T12
259
169
90
L1
221
L2
188
L3
162
L4
137
L5
114
Examples
Here are some examples: Mendez --> yellow; Old --> blue
Segment C3
The center position is the same. We see the rootlet in the axial view.
Segment C4
Axial view at the center of the segment for the new and old spinal segment
--> Not much difference of the appearance of the spinal rootlet
Segment C5
Axial view at the center of the segment for the new and old spinal segment
--> We can better see the spinal rootlet in the old spinal segment file
Segment T6
Segment T10
Suggestion
We need a surrogate measure to get the position of each spinal segment that we can relate to the PAM50.
Measures that relate the vertebrae to the spinal rootlets could be relevant here since we can position it for each level in the PAM50.
Intervertebral foramen to rostral rootlet
Intervertebral foramen to caudal rootlet
This would require identifying the intervertebral foramen on the PAM50 template
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
We are currently working to update the spinal levels files in the PAM50 (see #3 ).
Philips Lab created updated spinal levels files : Philips Lab spinal level files from the Mendez (2021).
The measures used from Mendez: Segment length at dorsal column entry
To bring the spinal level positioning in the PAM50 space, linear scaling between length of Mendez and the length of pixels between C2 and L5 in the PAM50 was done.
However, the spinal segments length doesn't vary linearly along the spinal cord. Using the length between C2-L5 won't necessarly be accurate for all levels to get the position in the PAM50 space.
New spinal segment positions vs before on PAM50
Here are the different positions of the center of each segment with the updated spinal levels vs before:
Examples
Here are some examples:
Mendez --> yellow; Old --> blue
Segment C3
The center position is the same. We see the rootlet in the axial view.
Segment C4
Axial view at the center of the segment for the new and old spinal segment
--> Not much difference of the appearance of the spinal rootlet
Segment C5
Axial view at the center of the segment for the new and old spinal segment
--> We can better see the spinal rootlet in the old spinal segment file
Segment T6
Segment T10
Suggestion
We need a surrogate measure to get the position of each spinal segment that we can relate to the PAM50.
Measures that relate the vertebrae to the spinal rootlets could be relevant here since we can position it for each level in the PAM50.
Intervertebral foramen to rostral rootlet
Intervertebral foramen to caudal rootlet
This would require identifying the intervertebral foramen on the PAM50 template
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: