Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for custom LDAP parameter encoder #509

Closed
marcingrzejszczak opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Add support for custom LDAP parameter encoder #509

marcingrzejszczak opened this issue Oct 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement

Comments

@marcingrzejszczak
Copy link
Contributor

Instead of @Param we could have an @LdapParam that could take an encoder class parameter that would then be used to have user-provided encoding.

@marcingrzejszczak marcingrzejszczak added the type: enhancement A general enhancement label Oct 22, 2024
marcingrzejszczak added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 23, 2024
mp911de pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 18, 2024
@mp911de mp911de linked a pull request Nov 18, 2024 that will close this issue
@mp911de mp911de added this to the 3.5 M1 (2025.0.0) milestone Nov 18, 2024
@mp911de mp911de self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 18, 2024
Refine Javadoc. Move LdapEncoder lookup into LdapParameters. Eagerly instantiate LdapEncoder. Refine method naming.

Add NameEncoder and LikeEncoder for simplified usage.

See #509
Original pull request: #518
mp911de added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 18, 2024
Refine Javadoc. Move LdapEncoder lookup into LdapParameters. Eagerly instantiate LdapEncoder. Refine method naming.

Add NameEncoder and LikeEncoder for simplified usage.

See #509
Original pull request: #518
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants