You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
10 years after the introduction of TLS 1.2, the previous protocol versions became deprecated in 2018. Now, another 4 years have passed. While I understand the need to support older clients, even big services like Microsoft 365 have long ceased to support these deprecated protocol versions.
I think Listed.to should consider the same step for their servers. You probably already are gathering stats on successful connections being made with them. From my experience it's probably well under 0.5% (but I don't exactly know the user demographic).
Edit: Of course, other improvements like employing a CAA policy etc. I would also like to see, especially because we're pointing our custom domains to the Listed.to servers, but TLS 1.0/1.1 is imo the most obvious issue, especially seeing as app.standardnotes.com does only support TLS 1.2 (but this one doesn't have HSTS, while listed.to has HSTS... confusing)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
10 years after the introduction of TLS 1.2, the previous protocol versions became deprecated in 2018. Now, another 4 years have passed. While I understand the need to support older clients, even big services like Microsoft 365 have long ceased to support these deprecated protocol versions.
I think Listed.to should consider the same step for their servers. You probably already are gathering stats on successful connections being made with them. From my experience it's probably well under 0.5% (but I don't exactly know the user demographic).
Edit: Of course, other improvements like employing a CAA policy etc. I would also like to see, especially because we're pointing our custom domains to the Listed.to servers, but TLS 1.0/1.1 is imo the most obvious issue, especially seeing as app.standardnotes.com does only support TLS 1.2 (but this one doesn't have HSTS, while listed.to has HSTS... confusing)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: