Equipment Satus Screen is mixed up

[MikeDP]

[0.3.5, Redmine 1.3.1.stable.8875]
Items in my equipment status list seem to get mixed up. As part of testing, I've got 6 items checked in at 4 different "locations" and the status screen looks like:

EQUIPMENT STATUS
Name            Type     Serial Number
Shipping (2)
Cleartest       ABC Ltd      180001

Production (2)
Cleartest       ABC Ltd      180002

Broken at Customer (3)
OMv1            ACME         170001

At Customer ()
Pump 2          Smiths       160001
Pump 2          Smiths       160002

Shipping (2)
XS Basic        Smiths       190001

My locations are really statuses, but this shouldn't be an issue, it's a text. I spent a little time flipping the items from one location to another before it got like this. Restarting Redmine doesn't fix it.
Obvious issues are:

• Item counts after locations are wrong or absent
• Individual item locations are correct
• Shipping location items haven't been combined properly

[stillru]

Same as my issue #23
I fix your patch an line 18 <th><=%t field_location %></th>, but it didn't help...

[MikeDP]

Hi stillru,
Sorry I'm very new to all this, I don't know any Ruby (yet).
Didn't notice your mixed up Equipment page in #23 - I see it now - I first saw mine mixed up later.
The line 18 missing : fixed a different Error 500 for me, I still have the one you found.

[stillru]

Now error near line 53 - undefined method `name' for #AssetCheckIn:0x7f8cc8a02128

<% end %>
51:               <td class="pluginESV_<%= oos_class %>"><%=h e.serial_number %></td>
52:               <% if !attribute_is_grouped?(:location) %>
53:               <td class="pluginESV_<%= oos_class %>"><%=h e.location %> (<%=t :ch_by %> <%=h e.last_checkin_by %>)</td>
54:               <% end %>
55:               <td class="pluginESV_<%= oos_class %>">
56:                <%= link_to "", edit_equipment_asset_path(e), :class => "icon icon-edit", :title => "Edit #{e.name}" %>

[stillru]

Now update to version 0.3.6. Bug still exist.

[sukima]

I can not seem to reproduce this. Can I get clarification and verify it still exists in latest?