Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Testing - Update batch of bibs #1432

Open
4 tasks done
ahafele opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open
4 tasks done

Testing - Update batch of bibs #1432

ahafele opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ahafele
Copy link

ahafele commented Nov 12, 2024

Per meeting notes/Jeremy: Ebsco tools don’t handle updates but we are currently doing SRS record updates for OCLC exports and handling optimistic locking.

  • Dump batch of bib records from -test or -stage. Could use file generated by an existing Data Export process.
  • Edit, e.g. add 6xx $0 with https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subject/TEST
  • Reload with batch endpoint
  • Review data and process for errors

Leverage existing OCLC workflow:
We retrieve the instance uuid from the 999 field
With instance uuid, we query the source-storage endpoint to retrieve the latest SRS uuid
We then use the change-manager endpoint to PUT the MARC record using the SRS uuid retrieved from the previous step

@ahafele ahafele assigned jermnelson and ahafele and unassigned ahafele Nov 15, 2024
@ahafele
Copy link
Author

ahafele commented Nov 20, 2024

80 records were exported with Data Exports default mapping and edited to add a 650 with ‡a TEST ‡0 https://id.loc.gov/authorities/subject/TEST
They were then PUT to /source-storage/batch/parsed-records endpoint.
MARC records updated successfully but the instances were not "refreshed"

@ahafele
Copy link
Author

ahafele commented Jan 14, 2025

We want to get some idea of timing loading bibs using https://github.com/FOLIO-FSE/folio_data_import. I've provided @jermnelson with a file of approximately 5k records that can be reloaded to folio-test with profile - SUL - Update MARC record w/ 999ffi ignoring field protections - they should match and update all records.

@ahafele
Copy link
Author

ahafele commented Jan 17, 2025

@jermnelson next step here? wait till Q is up and try a test load again so we can get a better view of timings?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants