-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Normative: Move numberingSystem before style in resolvedOptions #172
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Change and rationale LGTM. Does this reflect the plenary consensus or does this need to be raised again?
Perfect, will mark this and present it in plenary next. |
It need to be raised in plenary. That is exactly why I create this PR to make sure it went through proper process. |
Test the order of resolvedOptions in default setting Also add test to check the reading order of options based on the property returned in the default setting resolvedOptions. tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#167 tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#172 https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-duration-format/#sec-Intl.DurationFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions These two PRs are presenting to TC39 2023-09 meeting
Test the order of resolvedOptions in default setting Also add test to check the reading order of options based on the property returned in the default setting resolvedOptions. tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#167 tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#172 https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-duration-format/#sec-Intl.DurationFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions These two PRs are presenting to TC39 2023-09 meeting
test PR tc39/test262#3912 |
@ben-allen @sffc @ryzokuken This is discussed and agreed in TG2 in 2023-09-07 but we need someone to bring this up to TG1 in Nov 2023 before this can be merged. |
2023-11-28: This PR achieved TC39-TG1 consensus. |
@FrankYFTang could you please rebase this? Let's get this merged. |
Test the order of resolvedOptions in default setting Also add test to check the reading order of options based on the property returned in the default setting resolvedOptions. tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#167 tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#172 https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-duration-format/#sec-Intl.DurationFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions These two PRs are presenting to TC39 2023-09 meeting
Test the order of resolvedOptions in default setting Also add test to check the reading order of options based on the property returned in the default setting resolvedOptions. tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#167 tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#172 https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-duration-format/#sec-Intl.DurationFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions These two PRs are presenting to TC39 2023-09 meeting Swap actual/expected order Update test/intl402/DurationFormat/constructor-option-read-order.js Co-authored-by: André Bargull <[email protected]> Fix per anba suggestion
Test the order of resolvedOptions in default setting Also add test to check the reading order of options based on the property returned in the default setting resolvedOptions. tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#167 tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#172 https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-duration-format/#sec-Intl.DurationFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions These two PRs are presenting to TC39 2023-09 meeting Swap actual/expected order Update test/intl402/DurationFormat/constructor-option-read-order.js Co-authored-by: André Bargull <[email protected]> Fix per anba suggestion
Test the order of resolvedOptions in default setting Also add test to check the reading order of options based on the property returned in the default setting resolvedOptions. tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#167 tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#172 https://tc39.es/proposal-intl-duration-format/#sec-Intl.DurationFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions These two PRs are presenting to TC39 2023-09 meeting Swap actual/expected order Update test/intl402/DurationFormat/constructor-option-read-order.js Co-authored-by: André Bargull <[email protected]> Fix per anba suggestion
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279940 Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!). This patch makes the following changes to update `Intl.DurationFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions` to the latest spec: - Does not put `fractionalDigits` when it is `undefined`[1] - Put `numberingSystem` before `style`[2] [1]: tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#167 [2]: tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#172 * Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/IntlDurationFormat.cpp: (JSC::IntlDurationFormat::resolvedOptions const): * JSTests/test262/expectations.yaml:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279940 Reviewed by NOBODY (OOPS!). This patch makes the following changes to update `Intl.DurationFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions` to the latest spec: - Does not put `fractionalDigits` when it is `undefined`[1] - Put `numberingSystem` before `style`[2] [1]: tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#167 [2]: tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#172 * Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/IntlDurationFormat.cpp: (JSC::IntlDurationFormat::resolvedOptions const): * JSTests/test262/expectations.yaml: * JSTests/stress/intl-durationformat.js: (test):
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279940 Reviewed by Yusuke Suzuki. This patch makes the following changes to update `Intl.DurationFormat.prototype.resolvedOptions` to the latest spec: - Does not put `fractionalDigits` when it is `undefined`[1] - Put `numberingSystem` before `style`[2] [1]: tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#167 [2]: tc39/proposal-intl-duration-format#172 * Source/JavaScriptCore/runtime/IntlDurationFormat.cpp: (JSC::IntlDurationFormat::resolvedOptions const): * JSTests/test262/expectations.yaml: * JSTests/stress/intl-durationformat.js: (test): Canonical link: https://commits.webkit.org/283901@main
Fix #163
See the proposed action and reason by @anba in #163 (comment)