Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Encode keys in JWK format rather than publicBase58 #99

Open
tdiesler opened this issue Feb 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Encode keys in JWK format rather than publicBase58 #99

tdiesler opened this issue Feb 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
feature New feature or request

Comments

@tdiesler
Copy link
Owner

tdiesler commented Feb 24, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Multibase may also be a viable option
@tdiesler tdiesler added the feature New feature or request label Feb 24, 2023
@tdiesler tdiesler added this to the 23.3.0 milestone Feb 24, 2023
@tdiesler tdiesler changed the title DidDocs should encode keys in JWK format rather than publicBase58 Encode keys in JWK format rather than publicBase58 Feb 24, 2023
@tdiesler tdiesler modified the milestones: 23.3.0, 23.4.0 Mar 10, 2023
@tdiesler tdiesler removed this from the 23.4.0 milestone Apr 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@tdiesler