You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Efficacy Justification (why is this term necessary?): Part of a package of terms in support of biological inventory data.
Demand Justification (name at least two organizations that independently need this term): The Humboldt Extension Task Group proposing this term consists of numerous organizations.
Stability Justification (what concerns are there that this might affect existing implementations?): None
Implications for dwciri: namespace (does this change affect a dwciri term version)?: Needs ecoiri: equivalent.
Proposed attributes of the new term:
Term name (in lowerCamelCase for properties, UpperCamelCase for classes): isSamplingEffortReported
Term label (English, not normative): Is Sampling Effort Reported
Organized in Class (e.g., Occurrence, Event, Location, Taxon): Event
Definition of the term (normative): The sampling effort associated with the dwc:Event was reported.
Usage comments (recommendations regarding content, etc., not normative): Typically values of effort would be captured under the terms eco:samplingEffortValue and eco:samplingEffortUnit.
Examples (not normative): true; false
Refines (identifier of the broader term this term refines; normative): None
Replaces (identifier of the existing term that would be deprecated and replaced by this term; normative): None
ABCD 2.06 (XPATH of the equivalent term in ABCD or EFG; not normative): not in ABCD
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the Technical Architecture Group meeting on 2023-09-11 it was recommended that the comments for boolean terms include a statement such as, "Recommended best practice is to comply with the recommendations provided in the Boolean Controlled Vocabulary document (https://tag.tdwg.org/boolean/)."
From our ALA colleagues: 'Terms such as isSamplingEffortReported seem to be inferable from other terms. And having isSamplingEffortReported: true and samplingEffortValue (#80) empty makes no sense. Why are these terms needed?'
Discussed on 2023-11-29: it is important to have the term to filter datasets. That's a separate question from whether it can be populated through inference from the samplingEffortValue.
New term
Submitter: Humboldt Extension Task Group
Efficacy Justification (why is this term necessary?): Part of a package of terms in support of biological inventory data.
Demand Justification (name at least two organizations that independently need this term): The Humboldt Extension Task Group proposing this term consists of numerous organizations.
Stability Justification (what concerns are there that this might affect existing implementations?): None
Implications for dwciri: namespace (does this change affect a dwciri term version)?: Needs ecoiri: equivalent.
Proposed attributes of the new term:
Term name (in lowerCamelCase for properties, UpperCamelCase for classes): isSamplingEffortReported
Term label (English, not normative): Is Sampling Effort Reported
Organized in Class (e.g., Occurrence, Event, Location, Taxon): Event
Definition of the term (normative): The sampling effort associated with the dwc:Event was reported.
Usage comments (recommendations regarding content, etc., not normative): Typically values of effort would be captured under the terms eco:samplingEffortValue and eco:samplingEffortUnit.
Examples (not normative):
true
;false
Refines (identifier of the broader term this term refines; normative): None
Replaces (identifier of the existing term that would be deprecated and replaced by this term; normative): None
ABCD 2.06 (XPATH of the equivalent term in ABCD or EFG; not normative): not in ABCD
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: