Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Term - isSamplingEffortReported #78

Closed
tucotuco opened this issue Sep 4, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

New Term - isSamplingEffortReported #78

tucotuco opened this issue Sep 4, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member

tucotuco commented Sep 4, 2023

New term

  • Submitter: Humboldt Extension Task Group

  • Efficacy Justification (why is this term necessary?): Part of a package of terms in support of biological inventory data.

  • Demand Justification (name at least two organizations that independently need this term): The Humboldt Extension Task Group proposing this term consists of numerous organizations.

  • Stability Justification (what concerns are there that this might affect existing implementations?): None

  • Implications for dwciri: namespace (does this change affect a dwciri term version)?: Needs ecoiri: equivalent.
    Proposed attributes of the new term:

  • Term name (in lowerCamelCase for properties, UpperCamelCase for classes): isSamplingEffortReported

  • Term label (English, not normative): Is Sampling Effort Reported

  • Organized in Class (e.g., Occurrence, Event, Location, Taxon): Event

  • Definition of the term (normative): The sampling effort associated with the dwc:Event was reported.

  • Usage comments (recommendations regarding content, etc., not normative): Typically values of effort would be captured under the terms eco:samplingEffortValue and eco:samplingEffortUnit.

  • Examples (not normative): true; false

  • Refines (identifier of the broader term this term refines; normative): None

  • Replaces (identifier of the existing term that would be deprecated and replaced by this term; normative): None

  • ABCD 2.06 (XPATH of the equivalent term in ABCD or EFG; not normative): not in ABCD

@tucotuco
Copy link
Member Author

In the Technical Architecture Group meeting on 2023-09-11 it was recommended that the comments for boolean terms include a statement such as, "Recommended best practice is to comply with the recommendations provided in the Boolean Controlled Vocabulary document (https://tag.tdwg.org/boolean/)."

@kingenloff
Copy link
Collaborator

From our ALA colleagues: 'Terms such as isSamplingEffortReported seem to be inferable from other terms. And having isSamplingEffortReported: true and samplingEffortValue (#80) empty makes no sense. Why are these terms needed?'

@baskaufs
Copy link
Collaborator

Discussed on 2023-11-29: it is important to have the term to filter datasets. That's a separate question from whether it can be populated through inference from the samplingEffortValue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants