Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LABEL IMAGE script gives low time elapsed without ngraph bridge compared to with ngraph bridge implementation #803

Open
nishitchaudhry opened this issue Mar 19, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@nishitchaudhry
Copy link

I tried using script of image label classification from examples folder where I tried to compare two scripts one with ngraph bridge configuration and other without it, I found that when I calculate time elapsed using the code mentioned below,

config = tf.compat.v1.ConfigProto()
config_ngraph_enabled = ngraph_bridge.update_config(config)

with tf.compat.v1.Session(graph=graph, config=config_ngraph_enabled) as sess:
# Warmup
sess.run(output_operation.outputs[0], {
input_operation.outputs[0]: t})
# Run
import time
start = time.time()
results = sess.run(output_operation.outputs[0], {
input_operation.outputs[0]: t
})
elapsed = time.time() - start
print('Time elapsed: %f seconds' % elapsed)
results = np.squeeze(results)

I observe that the script without this above ngraph config implementation has faster time elapsed than the script with above ngraph config implementation.

Can anyone please guide me where I am going wrong?

Ideally the script with ngraph should have lesser computation time than the script without ngraph!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant