-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Feature]: Add Qdrant test container module #7503
Comments
Hi @russcam , thanks for the suggestion. Can you share the docker image and github repository, please? Also, the following information would be useful:
|
Hi @eddumelendez,
It supports a HTTP REST API and gRPC API. There's a community client, but for Testcontainer tests, a HTTP client is sufficient.
It allows setting an API key via env vars. API keys are the only current mechanism of auth.
It doesn't need this. Qdrant has a notion of collections in which it holds vectors and their payloads. No collections need to exist when starting Qdrant.
It's very quick. If there are existing collections bind mounted, then Qdrant can take some time to become ready, loading collections and vectors into RAM. But I would not expect this to be a typical usage for Testcontainers.
Anecdotally, it's lightweight on resources. I've opened an equivalent PR for Testcontainers for .NET, if it helps: testcontainers/testcontainers-dotnet#994 |
Hi @russcam, thanks for the information provided. I'll discuss this with the team as we are currently reviewing the modules topic. |
Hi, we have decided to not host the module. However, if you would like to host and release the module on your own you can make it available in our Module Catalog |
Hi @russcam, after revisiting this topic again we are interested in having Qdrant as a module. Would you like to contribute? |
Module
New Module
Problem
Qdrant is a vector search engine/database that is becoming popular for search and recommendations use cases. Qdrant provides docker images but there isn't currently an official java test container. This issue proposes adding one.
Solution
Add a qdrant module with an official java TestContainer
Benefit
Provides a qdrant test container for folks that need it
Alternatives
Folks who need a qdrant test container each define it themselves
Would you like to help contributing this feature?
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: