Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Story] As a room moderator I can configure protections #18

Open
Gnuxie opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

[Story] As a room moderator I can configure protections #18

Gnuxie opened this issue May 18, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@Gnuxie
Copy link
Member

Gnuxie commented May 18, 2024

Description

After the v2.0.0-beta.0 release, the protections configuration command have regressed and no longer function.

Acceptance Criteria

  • There is a tutorial that tells me how to view the settings for the JoinWaveShortCircuitProtection
  • There is a tutorial that tells me how to change the settings for the JoinWaveShortCircuitProtection
  • When I enter the wrong name for a protection while trying to enter a command, Draupnir tells me that I got the name wrong, rather than just printing the help again.
  • I can list all of the settings for a given protection and the description for each settings
    • This shows me the current value for the setting and also the default if I have diverged from the default.
    • The name of the setting is in a <code> block and I can copy the name (even when nested) to provide a new value in other commands.
      • Note: Consider using TypeBoxe's JSON path utilities to implement this.

Issues

PRs and Tasks

Total Pain

50

@Gnuxie Gnuxie moved this to Planned in Draupnir planning May 18, 2024
@Gnuxie Gnuxie moved this from Planned to Scheduled in Draupnir planning Jul 29, 2024
@Gnuxie
Copy link
Member Author

Gnuxie commented Nov 28, 2024

. o O ( I wonder if we can suggest the setting names as a prompt in add/set/remove? difficulty is that we don't have a way to prompt for an arbitrary value so it's not immediately useful, it might be useful for changing the active capability provider )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Scheduled
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant