-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 991
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes #37872 - set windows icon #10366
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
What is the license on something AI generated? |
According to https://bigsea.co/ideas/bing-image-creator/ and https://www.bing.com/new/termsofuseimagecreator#content-policy yes |
I think using AI for this is questionable. Not only from a license perspective. If it's too close, it might still violate the trademark and if it's not close enough it only confuses people. Makes me wonder what other people think about it. |
Looking at https://bigsea.co/ideas/bing-image-creator/#image-creator-faqs, it says "Certain limitations exist, such as restrictions on using images containing identifiable people, trademarks, or copyrighted material." I'd argue this is exactly what we have here and thus 👎 |
Understand. 2 possibilities:
As I want to get this done, I would purchase the icon and pay the bill :-) With this, we would need to add a note about the icon somewhere: Opinions? |
"no edits" means it's not FOSS. We can't add non-FOSS licensed stuff here. |
well, you should not edit the debian logo, too :) |
I think this is primarily a trademark issue, not a copyright or license. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/legal/intellectualproperty/trademarks states:
So I think what the Noun Project is doing is legally questionable. They're selling something that another company has a trademark on. https://cdn-dynmedia-1.microsoft.com/is/content/microsoftcorp/microsoft/mscle/documents/presentations/Windows_Trademark_guidelines_2023.pdf has specific rules for Windows. In short, 👎 on this unless we get a specific approval from Microsoft to use their symbol. |
Yes, that'd be a trademark violation. But the license allows me to (and I can do conversions etc, that don't alter the trademark).
I poked someone we all know at MSFT if there is a nice short cut to get such an approval :) |
Understand. We can not re-use the MS trademark in a different way. Would this be acceptable? |
Due to license restrictions, we can not use the original windows icons. Therefore, this icon is based on the windows icon from https://iconoir.com/ It's Open Source: https://github.com/iconoir-icons/iconoir/blob/main/LICENSE Original icon: https://github.com/iconoir-icons/iconoir/blob/f7395255f4621c83f8fa223915e90d36acf38adf/icons/regular/windows.svg?plain=1
Any news on this? |
Nope |
Due to license restrictions, we can not use the original windows icons.
Therefore, this icon is based on the windows icon from https://iconoir.com/
It's Open Source:
https://github.com/iconoir-icons/iconoir/blob/main/LICENSE
Original icon:
https://github.com/iconoir-icons/iconoir/blob/f7395255f4621c83f8fa223915e90d36acf38adf/icons/regular/windows.svg?plain=1