From 482d9441503224ebe336297c7c06d5b82dd57813 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Peters Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 12:39:49 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Update crimes.md --- psf/crimes.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/psf/crimes.md b/psf/crimes.md index 3adeb8e..32d5e28 100644 --- a/psf/crimes.md +++ b/psf/crimes.md @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Some of the links above resolve to write-ups below. - Casually mentioning scenarios involving sexual abuse, which may be inappropriate or triggering for some audiences. -There is a tiny shred of merit to this one. In my [account of pre-ban](ban) interactions, I noted that a mod once told me that a post was potentially offensive. It did mention sexual abuse, but not at all casually. The mod only asked me not to use "sexual abuse" in a hypothetical example again. In context, I thought the complaint was at best weakly justified, but in the interest of accommodation I didn't argue about it. Instead I edited two posts to use a different example, doing more than he asked for. It showed up in my list of "violations" anyway. +There is a tiny shred of merit to this one. In my [account of pre-ban](ban) interactions, I noted that a mod once told me that a post was potentially offensive. It did mention sexual abuse, but not at all casually. The mod only asked me not to use "sexual abuse" in a hypothetical example again. In context, I thought the complaint was at best weakly justified, but in the interest of accommodation I didn't argue about it. Instead I edited two posts to use a different hypothetical example, doing more than he asked for. It showed up in my list of "violations" anyway. You can see the changes by looking at the edit histories [here](https://discuss.python.org/t/considerations-around-legal-advice/56781/14) and [here](https://discuss.python.org/t/considerations-around-legal-advice/56781/16)