From 9720021e2a7c8e42a485650d8f2b3aad91812682 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Peters Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:51:44 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Update crimes.md --- psf/crimes.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/psf/crimes.md b/psf/crimes.md index 33b0836..9fede02 100644 --- a/psf/crimes.md +++ b/psf/crimes.md @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ I'm confident that any reasonable person reading [the topic](https://discuss.pyt You tell me. Does the CoC say anything about which good-faith topics can be discussed? About the extent to which they can be discussed? I make no apology for expressing what may be unpopular views, or for visibly opposing what I believe to be injustice, or attempts to evade accountability by those with corporate power. I'd say "so sue me", but "so ban me" may be more appropriate :wink:. -It occurred to me later that "excessive discussion" may be a violation of the Discourse [Community Guidelines](https://discuss.python.org/rules) promulgated during the pre-ban brouhaha. But, if so, that's not the CoC, and these were unambiguously sold as _being_ CoC violations. +It occurred to me later that "excessive discussion" may be a violation of the Discourse [Community Guidelines](https://discuss.python.org/rules) promulgated during the pre-ban brouhaha. But, if so, that's not the CoC, and these were unambiguously sold as _being_ CoC violations. Those guidlances were introduced after the byloaw topic concluded anyway. --- From 4adc09859ae4423e0261d4e3ed5558b1c9ee6462 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Peters Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 03:53:25 -0600 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Update psf/crimes.md --- psf/crimes.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/psf/crimes.md b/psf/crimes.md index 9fede02..e7b1aad 100644 --- a/psf/crimes.md +++ b/psf/crimes.md @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ I'm confident that any reasonable person reading [the topic](https://discuss.pyt You tell me. Does the CoC say anything about which good-faith topics can be discussed? About the extent to which they can be discussed? I make no apology for expressing what may be unpopular views, or for visibly opposing what I believe to be injustice, or attempts to evade accountability by those with corporate power. I'd say "so sue me", but "so ban me" may be more appropriate :wink:. -It occurred to me later that "excessive discussion" may be a violation of the Discourse [Community Guidelines](https://discuss.python.org/rules) promulgated during the pre-ban brouhaha. But, if so, that's not the CoC, and these were unambiguously sold as _being_ CoC violations. Those guidlances were introduced after the byloaw topic concluded anyway. +It occurred to me later that "excessive discussion" may be a violation of the Discourse [Community Guidelines](https://discuss.python.org/rules) promulgated during the pre-ban brouhaha. But, if so, that's not the CoC, and these were unambiguously sold as _being_ CoC violations. Those guidelines were introduced after the bylaws topic concluded anyway. ---