You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
What was VSYS with a boost converter chosen over using the PMID output of the BQ25895? I haven't played with the chip yet and I'm trying to figure out why this might be the case. The only reason I can come up with is that block diagram for the chip makes it look like PMID is only powered when there is power on VBUS. Where as VSYS can get power from VBUS or VBAT. However, there is contradicting verbiage (to the block diagram) in the datasheet that indicates that PMID can be power from VBAT.
"8.2.5 Boost Mode Operation from Battery
The device supports boost converter operation to deliver power from the battery to other portable devices
through PMID pin."
I realize that this is probably a better question for Ti but I learned of this chip through this design so I thought the designers of the board might have some insight. It appears that this design was lifted from the PMP4451 eval board which doesn't use the PMID pin of the BQ25895 as well.
Thanks in advance,
Jacob
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
VSYS is meant to be used to power the system, but is not able to provide 5V. PMID is connected to VIN, when present, so it will only be a regulated voltage when VIN is not present.
What was VSYS with a boost converter chosen over using the PMID output of the BQ25895? I haven't played with the chip yet and I'm trying to figure out why this might be the case. The only reason I can come up with is that block diagram for the chip makes it look like PMID is only powered when there is power on VBUS. Where as VSYS can get power from VBUS or VBAT. However, there is contradicting verbiage (to the block diagram) in the datasheet that indicates that PMID can be power from VBAT.
"8.2.5 Boost Mode Operation from Battery
The device supports boost converter operation to deliver power from the battery to other portable devices
through PMID pin."
I realize that this is probably a better question for Ti but I learned of this chip through this design so I thought the designers of the board might have some insight. It appears that this design was lifted from the PMP4451 eval board which doesn't use the PMID pin of the BQ25895 as well.
Thanks in advance,
Jacob
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: