Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
85 lines (63 loc) · 5.37 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

85 lines (63 loc) · 5.37 KB
Raw

README

mx is a command line based tool for managing the development of (primarily) Java code. It includes a mechanism for specifying the dependencies as well as making it simple to build, test, run, update, etc the code and built artifacts. mx contains support for developing code spread across multiple source repositories. mx is written in Python (version 2.7) and is extensible.

The organizing principle of mx is a suite. A suite is a directory containing one or more projects and also under the control of a version control system. A suite may import one or more dependent suites. One suite is designated as the primary suite. This is normally the suite in whose directory mx is executed. The set of suites that are reachable from the primary suite by transitive closure of the imports relation form the set that mx operates on. The set of suites implicitly defines the set of projects. The action of building a suite is to compile the code in the projects and generate one or more distributions which are 'jar' files containing the compiled classes and related metadata.

Running mx

mx can be run directly (i.e., python2.7 mx/mx.py ...), but is more commonly invoked via the mx/mx bash script (which includes a Python version check). Adding the mx/ directory to your PATH simplifies executing mx. The mx/mx.cmd script should be used on Windows.

The general form of the mx command line is:

mx [global options] [command] [command-specific options]

If no options or command is specified, mx prints information on the available options and commands, which will include any suite-specfic options and commands. Help for a specific command is obtained via mx help <command>. Global options are expected to have wide applicability to many commands and as such precede the command to be executed.

For an example of mx usage, you can read the Instructions for the Graal project.

mx versioning

mx uses a major.minor.patch versioning scheme. To figure out if the version is sufficient for a given mx suite, first compare the major version number of your mx version against the major number of the required version specified in the suite. If these versions are not equal, you cannot expect mx to be compatible with this suite. The minor number has to be greater or equal to the specified minor version number. Compatibility is ensured regardless of the patch level. However, if your patch level is lower than the required patch level you might trigger bugs in mx.

From an mx developer point of view this versioning scheme enforces the following update policy:

  • If you make a change that prevents the new version of mx from loading older files, increase the major number and reset both the minor and the patch level to 0.
  • If you add new functionality without breaking backward compatibility, leave the major as it is, increase the minor number and reset the patch level.
  • If you only fixed a bug without changing the public API (i.e., all files for the current version can still be loaded with the new version and vice versa), leave the major and minor versions as they are but increase the patch level.

The version update strategy is designed to help users to detect if their mx version is compatible with a suite. Thus, changes to the code that do not affect users do not require a change in the version number. See the following examples. In these examples, by user we mean command line clients or mx extensions (for example mx_graal-core.py).

  • "I found a for-loop in the code that could be expressed using a map function. I changed it accordingly." This change has no influence on users. Thus, no version change is required!

  • "I added a new mx command." Since this function was not available to users before, old scripts will continue to work with the new version. New scripts, however, might not work with old versions. This is a minor update and requires a new minor number and a reset of the patch level.

  • "I fixed a bug that caused a wrong result of a publicly available function." This is a bugfix that is user visible. The patch level should be increased since users of old versions can expect at least the bug that was just fixed.

  • "I fixed some documentation." This fix has no impact on the usage of mx and should thus not change the version of mx.

  • "I fixed a function. The result now differs from the results before. A user cannot call this function." Since this function is invisible to the user, no version update is required.

  • "I fixed a function. The result now differs from the results before. A user could call this function." Since the semantics of the function changed and the function is part of the API, old scripts might not work properly anymore. Since this change is not backward compatible, this is a major update.

  • "I added some internal functions." Since the functions are internal, they have no impact on users. No version changed is required.

  • "I added some new commands." Since the commands did not change the old commands, old scripts will continue to work as expected. New scripts that depend on the new commands will not work with older versions of mx. Thus, we need a new minor release.

  • "I removed some commands from mx. There are alternative commands now." This change essentially changed the API. Thus, we require a new major release.