Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve hydroelectric modeling #53

Open
toddmedema opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Improve hydroelectric modeling #53

toddmedema opened this issue Mar 15, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@toddmedema
Copy link
Owner

toddmedema commented Mar 15, 2024

Right now I base it purely on local rain data, but there are two other important factors:

  1. Upstream rain data (pretty instant) and snow cover / snow melt (gains during winter, melts slowly over summer)
  2. Water rights (e.g. how much of the water has to be released or saved for agriculture irrigation and drinking water)

Would be awesome to update the availability modeling to incorporate #1 (if you're going to work on this, let me know and I can procure some additional historic weather data). It would be important to add rainfall + snowpack information in the Forecasts -> Weather chart.

Additionally, one could consider available viable hydro-electric / pumped hydro locations per-scenario. So, rather than any other type of generator that can be built in any quantity + size, hydro, you only have a few slots you can use, each with a maximum size.

TODO: Research, should we update simulation modeling of pumped hydro storage to also act like a dam, in that it gains capacity from rain and snow melt?

V2: Would be even more awesome, as follow-up work, to create a scenario in the west/mid-west, where you have to deal with the shrinking water rights situation.

@toddmedema toddmedema changed the title Improve hydroelectric modeling - and potentially add a water rights scenario Improve hydroelectric modeling Mar 20, 2024
@toddmedema
Copy link
Owner Author

Some thoughts from Stephen Oyler in the Climatebase Fellowship:

Snow/rain: I’m not intimately familiar with west water rights but know they’re a huge deal. When at Westinghouse, there was a developer looking at building nuclear and one of their big selling points was securing water rights (their board had a UT legislator, I think that helped?). For snow and rain melt broadly though, there are competing interests, namely agricultural and recreation, but more to it like livelihoods, cultural and tribal considerations, and even energy needs for cooling. Note that some hydro might be pumped (and re-pumped). Best examples that come to mind: https://www.consumersenergy.com/company/electric-generation/renewables/hydroelectric/pumped-storage-hydro-electricity and https://www.dominionenergy.com/projects-and-facilities/hydroelectric-power-facilities-and-projects/bath-county-pumped-storage-station.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant