You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see there is some Docker support in master, but the Dockerfiles are looking like they are made for the development of Pootle, not for production use. Also there are no Dockerfiles in the release tags.
Having Official Docker images on https://hub.docker.com would greatly benefit Pootle because:
Easier set-up
Less management for new users
Easier updating
Faster and greater adoption
Faster feedback
I haven't seen any documentation regarding the Docker set-up except PR #6846, which hasn't been touched in a few months.
In order to get the Docker images on the Docker Hub, we need to:
Prepare a Docker image ready for production
The Dockerfile must have hardcoded the Pootle version (changes on every release)
...regarding making an official image, the requirements are quite strict, not sure if these are met atm, but i think what is there would probs be a good starting point
I see there is some Docker support in
master
, but theDockerfile
s are looking like they are made for the development of Pootle, not for production use. Also there are noDockerfile
s in the release tags.Having Official Docker images on https://hub.docker.com would greatly benefit Pootle because:
I haven't seen any documentation regarding the Docker set-up except PR #6846, which hasn't been touched in a few months.
In order to get the Docker images on the Docker Hub, we need to:
Dockerfile
must have hardcoded the Pootle version (changes on every release)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: