You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My question is can I use the other network specified in paper like VGG16 etc? these pre-trained networks like ResNet are also available for this task ? if yes then How can I use them? like in the above command we specify with --cfg and --wts arguments . then what will be the link of that networks ? or I need to train them and only then I can use it?
My second Question is . Is the ResNet is fastest for this task? or any other available network perform better on video file because output using ResNet is very slow.?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As the answer to your second question, ResNet was the fastest when I run the tests, it was a while ago. I can not say how are the performance now with other models.
Hi,
I am using ResNet for infer on video file with this given command and it is working well.
python2 tools/infer_vid.py
--cfg configs/DensePose_ResNet101_FPN_s1x-e2e.yaml
--output-dir DensePoseData/infer_out/
--wts https://s3.amazonaws.com/densepose/DensePose_ResNet101_FPN_s1x-e2e.pkl
--input-file filename
My question is can I use the other network specified in paper like VGG16 etc? these pre-trained networks like ResNet are also available for this task ? if yes then How can I use them? like in the above command we specify with --cfg and --wts arguments . then what will be the link of that networks ? or I need to train them and only then I can use it?
My second Question is . Is the ResNet is fastest for this task? or any other available network perform better on video file because output using ResNet is very slow.?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: