You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see that urbs requires "Any solver supported by pyomo; suggestion: GLPK"
I see that urbs is not a recent development and perhaps its author(s) and users are unaware that our very much more powerful LP solvers in HiGHS - available for a few years and callable from Pyomo - would be of value when solving larger models. For justification of this assertion, I refer you to the industry standard independent benchmark tests carried out by Hans Mittelmann: https://plato.asu.edu/bench.html
The interior point solver is very likely to give better performance. This is selected by setting the option solver="ipm", since simplex is currently used by default
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I see that urbs requires "Any solver supported by pyomo; suggestion: GLPK"
I see that urbs is not a recent development and perhaps its author(s) and users are unaware that our very much more powerful LP solvers in HiGHS - available for a few years and callable from Pyomo - would be of value when solving larger models. For justification of this assertion, I refer you to the industry standard independent benchmark tests carried out by Hans Mittelmann: https://plato.asu.edu/bench.html
The interior point solver is very likely to give better performance. This is selected by setting the option solver="ipm", since simplex is currently used by default
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: