You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 13, 2021. It is now read-only.
I found some unusual behavior as the standard deviation of some test data (on either side of a step change) drops.
When the sd is less than 1, the detection of the change becomes inaccurate - in a very defined manner. [EDIT: I'd note that the '1' is a big coincidence - the knee changes as the data range changes, as you might expect]
See the below. My data actually changes at point 500, EDM-X finds this to within two intervals above that and is out by 50 intervals below.
Further to this, I think the issue is when the SD and the number of observations are such that there the two medians tend to 1 and 0 for all data ranges (values of tau2 and tau1) => that leads to the medians being ignored and the algorithm converging at a point determined by tau2 and tau1 (and hence the sizes of the two datasets), which isn't the actual breakout. Or something like that.
I'm thinking this won't be too much of a problem with real data (I found it with a naive test case) but would be interested in any comments?
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I found some unusual behavior as the standard deviation of some test data (on either side of a step change) drops.
When the sd is less than 1, the detection of the change becomes inaccurate - in a very defined manner. [EDIT: I'd note that the '1' is a big coincidence - the knee changes as the data range changes, as you might expect]
See the below. My data actually changes at point 500, EDM-X finds this to within two intervals above that and is out by 50 intervals below.
I'd be interested in any comments on this...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: