Proposals/Request for Comment View (`rfc.ubq.fi`) #54

0x4007 · 2024-06-03T07:49:03Z

I've opened up a couple of proposals, essentially requests for comment. It could be useful to aggregate them onto a single view for ease-of-access to the DAO. Recent examples:

I imagine that we can find issues without pricing and populate them under the "proposals" view.

Fork this repository, make rfc.ubq.fi repository
Fork devpool-directory repository, make devpool-rfc repository
rfc.ubq.fi UI should load from devpool-rfc "backend"

A Note on Forks

It seems that we have use cases for similar UI code but for different purposes. Perhaps it makes sense to fork and create new repos (leaderboard.ubq.fi, rfc.ubq.fi.)

In addition, we already have https://github.com/ubiquity/devpool-directory and https://github.com/ubiquity/devpool-directory-private. Ideally we could consolidate everything into a single aggregator repository, and collect even the github issues without pricing. That way we only need to maintain a single repository (instead of potentially three) for our "backend" of issues.

For now lets just do another fork and then we can worry about consolidating them into a "single backend" in a future project.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

0x4007 · 2024-06-03T12:01:57Z

@ubiquity/software-development rfc

rndquu · 2024-06-04T08:02:45Z

Github discussions serve the same purpose.

Regarding a unified UI, we should create a design system first with typography, colors, UI components, etc...(example)

0x4007 · 2024-06-04T08:24:35Z

Github discussions serve the same purpose.

We tried using these in the past and it seemed that Issues always were able to handle the business need more effectively than Discussions. In addition, it was an extra step to convert to Issues to start the work. The extra barrier adds friction. That's why we basically no longer use Discussions.

Regarding a unified UI, we should create a design system first with typography, colors, UI components, etc...(example)

The closest thing we've got is dao.ubq.fi/branding can add more detail at some point though.

However I was actually referring to the page layout and everything with the list view etc. It seems like it could be useful for all of the applications.

0x4007 · 2024-06-06T09:49:11Z

Alright for now lets just do another fork and then we can worry about consolidating them into a "single backend" in a future project.

xno-miner · 2024-06-11T13:50:57Z

/wallet 0x5ea33b5133d418f99C510ae8Bbe83f6040b99338

ubiquibot · 2024-06-11T13:51:06Z

+ Successfully registered wallet address

xno-miner · 2024-06-11T13:51:19Z

/start

ubiquibot · 2024-06-11T13:51:26Z



Deadline Wed, Jun 12, 1:51 PM UTC

Registered Wallet
0x5ea33b5133d418f99C510ae8Bbe83f6040b99338

Tips:

Use /wallet 0x0000...0000 if you want to update your registered payment wallet address.
Be sure to open a draft pull request as soon as possible to communicate updates on your progress.
Be sure to provide timely updates to us when requested, or you will be automatically unassigned from the task.

xno-miner · 2024-06-11T16:27:27Z

Seems to be working with a test issue. Now https://github.com/xno-miner/rfc.ubq.fi/ and https://github.com/xno-miner/devpool-rfc need to be forked to ubiquity.

0x4007 · 2024-06-11T18:45:20Z

Please show a test deploy link. It doesn't seem possible if your "backend" has no relevant changes ubiquity/devpool-directory@development...xno-miner:devpool-rfc:development

xno-miner · 2024-06-11T19:08:32Z

Oh sorry, I didn't understand the issue fully before, I am currently continuing work.

xno-miner · 2024-06-11T21:07:08Z

I have made the changes that should make the backend work, but I am unable to run the bot locally. Please try it out and check if it works.

0x4007 · 2024-06-17T05:23:18Z

@rndquu would you mind reviewing the "backend" code? As I recall you are the primary author and would likely be the most effective reviewer.

You can find the "backend" changes here ubiquity/devpool-directory@development...xno-miner:devpool-rfc:development

You can find the proposals directory here https://github.com/xno-miner/devpool-rfc/issues?q=is%3Aissue+

@xno-miner the inverted logic regarding pricing labels:

// if issue HAS the "Price" label then skip it

Seems to make sense to me so I am inclined to believe that the changes are good

Given that the changes are so small, perhaps it makes sense to just handle them in our existing backend? Perhaps you can open a pull to there @xno-miner? I imagine that you can use if else conditionals since the logic seemingly is just the opposite.

xno-miner · 2024-06-17T12:52:04Z

I have created the pull request, the changes are described in the pull request description.

ubiquity/devpool-directory#1212

Keyrxng · 2024-08-10T23:07:06Z

I just got pretty confused with these tasks if I'm honest.

The open PR aims to consolidate RFC logic into the current devpool-directory and so does this cover item 1 in Add support for proposals on 'work.ubq.fi': "upgrade backend"?

This spec implies that the work involved with rfc.ubq.fi is a requirement for this task to be completed. Is it expected that this issue won't be complete until the relevant work on the UI is complete too? And if this is true, then is working on work.ubq.fi filtering and an additional view as step 2 required in the larger task?

Seems like 'double dipping' as it's been called before but it leaves only repo-sync-solution as step 3 of the larger task.

Should we point the open PR towards a dedicated task in https://github.com/ubiquity/devpool-directory-bounties/issues and we can allow item 2 of the larger task to be worked on via this task?

Also ubiquity/devpool-directory-tasks#25 is a duplicate of item 3 of the larger task as well. Some consolidating of the issues would make things a lot clearer

0x4007 · 2024-08-11T20:35:51Z

I think a separate ui is fine (possible fork of this codebase)

The backend logic must be completed for that new ui to load the right data though.

Please feel free to do as you see fit with the tasks regarding consolidation.

kingsley-einstein · 2024-09-25T10:51:12Z

/wallet 0xb69DB7b7B3aD64d53126DCD1f4D5fBDaea4fF578

ubiquity-os · 2024-09-25T10:51:17Z

+ Successfully registered wallet address

rndquu · 2024-10-04T09:25:19Z

As far as I understand this issue may be closed as "not planned" because https://work.ubq.fi/ now supports displaying both tasks and proposals.

ubiquity-os · 2024-10-04T14:03:03Z

! You have reached your max task limit. Please close out some tasks before assigning new ones.

ubiquity-os · 2024-10-04T14:03:13Z

@0x4007 the deadline is at Sat, Oct 5, 2:03 PM UTC

0x4007 · 2024-10-04T14:09:03Z

@gentlementlegen third reward that didn't render perhaps it's manifest related

gentlementlegen · 2024-10-05T01:35:49Z

@0x4007 Same error as before:

    {
      "message": [
        "Error in event handler",
        "HttpError: This installation has been suspended - https://docs.github.com/rest/reference/apps#create-an-installation-access-token-for-an-app"
      ],
      "level": "error",
      "timestamp": 1728092089294
    }

The app is most likely suspended here or on the target repo.

0x4007 · 2024-10-05T04:58:14Z

I'm not sure what to do. We don't want both bots leaving comments

gentlementlegen · 2024-10-05T05:03:02Z

@0x4007 I think we should use ubiquibot-os everywhere for now since it is set up.

0x4007 · 2024-10-05T05:35:00Z

Please give me actionable steps or you can fix. I don't understand

gentlementlegen · 2024-10-05T07:13:31Z

The Beta bot won't be able to run if it is not enabled in the other repo and vice versa it seems. We should only use the production bot everywhere probably.

0x4007 · 2024-10-05T09:02:32Z

So we need both bots to have access on marketplace.

We can have a new switch in the config that defines it's only for beta or production bot to read.

If the bot doesn't have a valid config then it shouldn't respond to any user actions, like comments and commands.

xno-miner · 2024-10-05T14:19:39Z

Are the payouts fixed yet?

ubiquity-os · 2024-10-22T04:21:06Z

[ 691.3435 UUSD ]
@0x4007

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Task	1	600
Issue	Specification	1	42.45
Issue	Comment	10	48.8935
Review	Comment	3	0

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
I've opened up a couple of proposals, essentially requests for c…	14.15 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 10 ul: score: 1 elementCount: 1 li: score: 0.5 elementCount: 5 ol: score: 1 elementCount: 1 h3: score: 1 elementCount: 1 result: 5.5 regex: wordCount: 190 wordValue: 0.1 result: 8.65	1	42.45
@ubiquity/software-development rfc	0.65 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 4 wordValue: 0.2 result: 0.65	0.7	0.455
We tried using these in the past and it seemed that Issues alway…	15.02 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 3 a: score: 5 elementCount: 1 result: 5 regex: wordCount: 100 wordValue: 0.2 result: 10.02	0.9	14.018
Alright for now lets just do another fork and then we can worry …	2.98 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 24 wordValue: 0.2 result: 2.98	0.8	2.384
Please show a test deploy link. It doesn't seem possible if your…	3.7 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 31 wordValue: 0.2 result: 3.7	0.6	2.22
@rndquu would you mind reviewing the "backend" code? As I recall…	22.61 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 6 hr: score: 0 elementCount: 2 a: score: 5 elementCount: 2 result: 10 regex: wordCount: 131 wordValue: 0.2 result: 12.61	0.75	19.4575
I think a separate ui is fine (possible fork of this codebase) …	4.8 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 42 wordValue: 0.2 result: 4.8	0.85	4.08
@gentlementlegen third reward that didn't render perhaps it's ma…	1.65 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 12 wordValue: 0.2 result: 1.65	0.4	0.66
I'm not sure what to do. We don't want both bots leaving comments	2 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 15 wordValue: 0.2 result: 2	0.5	1
Please give me actionable steps or you can fix. I don't understa…	1.77 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 13 wordValue: 0.2 result: 1.77	0.3	0.531
So we need both bots to have access on marketplace. We can have…	5.84 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 53 wordValue: 0.2 result: 5.84	0.7	4.088
Resolves https://github.com/ubiquity/.github/issues/115Resolve…	0 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 3 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 33 wordValue: 0 result: 0	0.8	0
Cypress is unreliable so I'm ignoring it.	1.17 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 8 wordValue: 0.2 result: 1.17	0.1	0
It's too bad I can't revert from mobile.	1.42 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 10 wordValue: 0.2 result: 1.42	0.1	0

[ 7.578 UUSD ]
@rndquu

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	2	7.578

Conversation Incentives

Comment

Formatting

Relevance

Reward

Github discussions serve the same purpose.Regarding a unified …

6.49

content:
  content:
    p:
      score: 0
      elementCount: 2
    a:
      score: 5
      elementCount: 1
  result: 5
regex:
  wordCount: 24
  wordValue: 0.1
  result: 1.49

0.8

6.192

As far as I understand this issue may be closed as "not planned"…

1.54

content:
  content:
    p:
      score: 0
      elementCount: 1
  result: 0
regex:
  wordCount: 25
  wordValue: 0.1
  result: 1.54

0.9

1.386

[ 1.11975 UUSD ]
@xno-miner

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	5	1.11975

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
Seems to be working with a test issue. Now https://github.com/xn…	1.85 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 31 wordValue: 0.1 result: 1.85	0.8	0.3675
Oh sorry, I didn't understand the issue fully before, I am curre…	1 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 15 wordValue: 0.1 result: 1	0.6	0.15
I have made the changes that should make the backend work, but I…	1.75 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 29 wordValue: 0.1 result: 1.75	0.7	0.30875
I have created the pull request, the changes are described in th…	1.44 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 2 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 23 wordValue: 0.1 result: 1.44	0.7	0.252
Are the payouts fixed yet?	0.39 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 5 wordValue: 0.1 result: 0.39	0.4	0.0415

[ 7.123 UUSD ]
@Keyrxng

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	1	7.123

Conversation Incentives

Comment	Formatting	Relevance	Reward
I just got pretty confused with these tasks if I'm honest.The …	8.38 content: content: p: score: 0 elementCount: 6 hr: score: 0 elementCount: 1 result: 0 regex: wordCount: 183 wordValue: 0.1 result: 8.38	0.85	7.123

[ 3.177 UUSD ]
@gentlementlegen

Contributions Overview

View	Contribution	Count	Reward
Issue	Comment	3	3.177

Conversation Incentives

Comment

Formatting

Relevance

Reward

@0x4007 Same error as before:```json{…

1.11

content:
  content:
    p:
      score: 0
      elementCount: 2
  result: 0
regex:
  wordCount: 17
  wordValue: 0.1
  result: 1.11

0.9

0.999

@0x4007 I think we should use `ubiquibot-os` everywhere …

0.94

content:
  content:
    p:
      score: 0
      elementCount: 1
  result: 0
regex:
  wordCount: 14
  wordValue: 0.1
  result: 0.94

0.7

0.658

The Beta bot won't be able to run if it is not enabled in the ot…

1.9

content:
  content:
    p:
      score: 0
      elementCount: 1
  result: 0
regex:
  wordCount: 32
  wordValue: 0.1
  result: 1.9

0.8

1.52

0x4007 added the Priority: 2 (Medium) label Jun 3, 2024

0x4007 changed the title ~~Proposals View (proposals.ubq.fi?)~~ Proposals/Request for Comment View (rfc.ubq.fi) Jun 3, 2024

0x4007 added the Time: <1 Day label Jun 6, 2024

ubiquibot bot added the Price: 400 USD label Jun 6, 2024

ubiquibot bot assigned xno-miner Jun 11, 2024

xno-miner mentioned this issue Jun 17, 2024

Implement handling RFCs ubiquity/devpool-directory#1212

Closed

ubiquibot bot unassigned xno-miner Jun 18, 2024

0x4007 mentioned this issue Jul 22, 2024

Add support for proposals on work.ubq.fi ubiquity/.github#115

Closed

devpool-directory-superintendent bot mentioned this issue Aug 29, 2024

Proposals/Request for Comment View (rfc.ubq.fi) ubiquity/devpool-directory#1403

Closed

0x4007 added Priority: 3 (High) and removed Priority: 2 (Medium) labels Sep 13, 2024

ubiquity-os bot added Price: 600 USD and removed Price: 400 USD labels Sep 13, 2024

ubiquity-os bot added the Price: 600 USD label Sep 13, 2024

0x4007 mentioned this issue Oct 4, 2024

feat: proposal viewer #94

Merged

0x4007 self-assigned this Oct 4, 2024

0x4007 closed this as completed Oct 4, 2024

gentlementlegen reopened this Oct 5, 2024

gentlementlegen closed this as completed Oct 5, 2024

0x4007 mentioned this issue Oct 5, 2024

Config (dev/prod) Environment Switch ubiquity-os/ubiquity-os-kernel#122

Closed

gentlementlegen reopened this Oct 22, 2024

gentlementlegen closed this as completed Oct 22, 2024

Proposals/Request for Comment View (rfc.ubq.fi) #54

Proposals/Request for Comment View (rfc.ubq.fi) #54

Comments

0x4007 commented Jun 3, 2024 • edited Loading

A Note on Forks

0x4007 commented Jun 3, 2024

rndquu commented Jun 4, 2024

0x4007 commented Jun 4, 2024 • edited Loading

0x4007 commented Jun 6, 2024

xno-miner commented Jun 11, 2024

ubiquibot bot commented Jun 11, 2024

xno-miner commented Jun 11, 2024

ubiquibot bot commented Jun 11, 2024

Tips:

xno-miner commented Jun 11, 2024

0x4007 commented Jun 11, 2024

xno-miner commented Jun 11, 2024

xno-miner commented Jun 11, 2024

0x4007 commented Jun 17, 2024 • edited Loading

xno-miner commented Jun 17, 2024 • edited by 0x4007 Loading

Keyrxng commented Aug 10, 2024 • edited Loading

0x4007 commented Aug 11, 2024 • edited Loading

kingsley-einstein commented Sep 25, 2024

ubiquity-os bot commented Sep 25, 2024

rndquu commented Oct 4, 2024

ubiquity-os bot commented Oct 4, 2024

ubiquity-os bot commented Oct 4, 2024

0x4007 commented Oct 4, 2024

gentlementlegen commented Oct 5, 2024

0x4007 commented Oct 5, 2024

gentlementlegen commented Oct 5, 2024

0x4007 commented Oct 5, 2024

gentlementlegen commented Oct 5, 2024

0x4007 commented Oct 5, 2024 • edited Loading

xno-miner commented Oct 5, 2024

ubiquity-os bot commented Oct 22, 2024 • edited Loading

Contributions Overview

Conversation Incentives

Contributions Overview

Conversation Incentives

Contributions Overview

Conversation Incentives

Contributions Overview

Conversation Incentives

Contributions Overview

Conversation Incentives

Proposals/Request for Comment View (`rfc.ubq.fi`) #54

Proposals/Request for Comment View (`rfc.ubq.fi`) #54

0x4007 commented Jun 3, 2024 •

edited

Loading

0x4007 commented Jun 4, 2024 •

edited

Loading

0x4007 commented Jun 17, 2024 •

edited

Loading

xno-miner commented Jun 17, 2024 •

edited by 0x4007

Loading

Keyrxng commented Aug 10, 2024 •

edited

Loading

0x4007 commented Aug 11, 2024 •

edited

Loading

0x4007 commented Oct 5, 2024 •

edited

Loading

ubiquity-os bot commented Oct 22, 2024 •

edited

Loading