Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Did you use pretrained models for training all fine-grained datasets? #3

Open
zzzucf opened this issue Oct 17, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Comments

@zzzucf
Copy link

zzzucf commented Oct 17, 2018

In your paper, figure 6 showed all results for fine-grained datasets. However, when I tried to reproduce the results in bird dataset, I can only get 53% acc. Did you use any pre-trained model for training that? And can you post the code that can be helpful to reproduce your paper's result? Best regards.

@goldentimecoolk
Copy link

I have the same problem, getting ~52% accuracy in bird test dataset. I guess data_transforms might be one tricky, because parameters including mean, std, eigval, eigvec are calculated in ImageNet dataset. Pre-train maybe another tricky. Do you improve the accuracy? @zzzucf

@zzzucf
Copy link
Author

zzzucf commented Apr 11, 2019

use their pretrained mode and You can find the transform in pytorch site which is the same as their then u can repoduce the result.

@goldentimecoolk
Copy link

I used their pretrained model and got 80%+ accuracy in cub200 just now. As for transform, do you mean params they provide based on Imagenet dont need to be modified?

@zzzucf
Copy link
Author

zzzucf commented Apr 11, 2019 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants