You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In your paper, figure 6 showed all results for fine-grained datasets. However, when I tried to reproduce the results in bird dataset, I can only get 53% acc. Did you use any pre-trained model for training that? And can you post the code that can be helpful to reproduce your paper's result? Best regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have the same problem, getting ~52% accuracy in bird test dataset. I guess data_transforms might be one tricky, because parameters including mean, std, eigval, eigvec are calculated in ImageNet dataset. Pre-train maybe another tricky. Do you improve the accuracy? @zzzucf
I used their pretrained model and got 80%+ accuracy in cub200 just now. As for transform, do you mean params they provide based on Imagenet dont need to be modified?
In your paper, figure 6 showed all results for fine-grained datasets. However, when I tried to reproduce the results in bird dataset, I can only get 53% acc. Did you use any pre-trained model for training that? And can you post the code that can be helpful to reproduce your paper's result? Best regards.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: