-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Enhancement] Relative References #21
Comments
Sounds useful. Should these objects keep their relative pose when one is updated? Or it's just for easy placement, and then the objects are independent? |
I think that both are useful. Maybe there should be a boolean variable asking whether or not to move with the parent object rather than just computing a relative-to-global position and storing it. |
I was thinking to solve this issue not in a hacky way, and I think we should rewrite some code and merge position and orientation inside a tag called pose (for example) and add two attributes to pose tags: In my opinion it will make easier the parsing code in ConfigXMLparser as sensors vehicles and object's pose would be the same way. And it's much more intuitive than adding another tag relativeTo in objects. So at the end would be something like: Global position object relative to other object/node attached to other object/node This will require some minor changes in your scenes, but I thinks it's worthy. What do you think? I guess Miquel can't answer right now but maybe the rest... ;) Edited to write XML as it should |
Please add an option to position objects in a scene relative to other objects from an urdf file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: