Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update tapestry-offline dependency #30

Open
Tr1aL opened this issue May 13, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

update tapestry-offline dependency #30

Tr1aL opened this issue May 13, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@Tr1aL
Copy link

Tr1aL commented May 13, 2017

Hi. Can you update tapestry-offline dependency to latest version?

@uklance
Copy link
Owner

uklance commented May 13, 2017

Hi, which feature are you wanting to see from the tapestry-offline version change?

@Tr1aL
Copy link
Author

Tr1aL commented May 14, 2017

You removed the DefauteOfflineRegestContext from the latest version of tapestry-offline and if I do this update then the tapestry-atmosphere don't compile

@uklance
Copy link
Owner

uklance commented May 14, 2017

The current trunk of tapestry-atmosphere compiles against tapestry-offline version 0.0.2 which is here

You can reference artifacts using

<repositories> 
   <repository> 
      <id>uklance-releases</id>
      <url>https://raw.github.com/uklance/releases/master</url>
   </repository> 
</repositories>

@Tr1aL
Copy link
Author

Tr1aL commented May 14, 2017

Thanks, I saw this in the examples, but I want to have full control over the code, since I will probably modify it, because I use the source.
So you do not want to update the dependencies to the latter?

@uklance
Copy link
Owner

uklance commented May 14, 2017

I haven't yet released tapestry-offline 0.0.3 which is an api change from 0.0.2 because the HttpServletRequest / Response are now spoofed. It's on my radar to release 0.0.3 and upgrade tapestry-atmosphere and tapestry-cometd to use the new version. I'll try and get some time to do this. What are you thinking of changing?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants