Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🔄 synced file(s) with upbound/sa-up #64

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

upbound-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@upbound-bot upbound-bot commented Nov 25, 2024

synced local file(s) with upbound/sa-up.

Changed files
  • created local .github/CODEOWNERS from remote .github/CODEOWNERS

This PR was created automatically by the repo-file-sync-action workflow run #12009742526

Copy link

upbound/configuration-app #64

Change Summary

  • Added a symbolic link to the CODEOWNERS file from the root .github directory to the repository's .github directory

Potential Vulnerabilities

  • File: .github/CODEOWNERS:1
  • Code: ../../.github/CODEOWNERS
  • Explanation: The symbolic link points to a location outside the repository's root directory using relative paths (../../). This could potentially lead to path traversal issues if not properly validated, allowing access to files outside the intended scope.

Code Smells

  • File: .github/CODEOWNERS:1
  • Code: ../../.github/CODEOWNERS
  • Explanation: Using relative paths in symbolic links can make the codebase harder to maintain and understand. Absolute paths or repository-relative paths would be clearer and less prone to breakage when directory structures change.

Debug Logs

No debug logs found in the changes.

Unintended Consequences

  • File: .github/CODEOWNERS:1
  • Code: ../../.github/CODEOWNERS
  • Explanation: The symbolic link to an external CODEOWNERS file means that any changes to the external file will automatically affect this repository. This could lead to unexpected ownership changes if the external file is modified without considering the impact on this repository.

Risk Score: 7

The high risk score is due to:

  1. The potential for path traversal vulnerabilities
  2. External dependency on a file outside the repository
  3. Possible unintended changes to code ownership rules

@kaessert kaessert merged commit 6de7494 into main Nov 25, 2024
1 check passed
@kaessert kaessert deleted the repo-sync/sa-up/default branch November 25, 2024 12:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants