Mesh Generating Tool Suggestion #1042
Unanswered
CalebDmArcher
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments
-
Gmsh is the only mesher we've worked with. (Near)isotropic meshes are desirable for our own work. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Switching to a discussion in the hopes that some FiPy user might offer an alternative. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi, are there any good mesh-generating tools suggested that are compatible with Fipy other than Gmsh?
I am using Gmsh currently but seems like Gmsh is not good at handling some cases such as a multiple-thin-layer structure:
I used
to calculate the area of the top surface of the structure for the mesh file below. And get the value of A (3e-5) which is much smaller than if I calculate the area by using width times length (Lx * Ly = 0.05 * 0.02 = 1e-4).
And there are also some ill-shape warnings which might imply that the mesh quality is not good. So even if I use (Lx * Ly) as the top surface area, the solution from solving the equation using Fipy is also not correct which I suspect is due to the poor mesh quality. (The reason that I can tell the result is not correct is because it does not match the result from a paper as well as my calculation by hand.)
A person from Gmsh forum said that Gmsh primarily generates isotropic instructed meshes so I feel like it is not very suitable for the case that the structure is thin and I need the mesh to have large scales on the x and y direction but a small scale on the z direction. I can set a smaller mesh size in general but it will make the program extremely slow.
Below is the code for solving the problem by using Fipy which might not be important for this discussion but just in case:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions