You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 1, 2023. It is now read-only.
Using an approach similar to #149 would there be any appetite for adding the ability to filter jobs by worker? I was thinking something simple wherein a user can enter a worker name as a freeform string and it'd match any workers containing the string.
I'm happy to put together a PR, assuming there's no reason this functionality shouldn't exist.
With regards to the UI perhaps something like the following would suffice:
I'm happy for other suggestions, as personally I'm not a massive fan of how much horizontal space this new form field would need compared to the status and pagination dropdowns that are already supported.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Using an approach similar to #149 would there be any appetite for adding the ability to filter jobs by worker? I was thinking something simple wherein a user can enter a worker name as a freeform string and it'd match any workers containing the string.
I'm happy to put together a PR, assuming there's no reason this functionality shouldn't exist.
With regards to the UI perhaps something like the following would suffice:
I'm happy for other suggestions, as personally I'm not a massive fan of how much horizontal space this new form field would need compared to the status and pagination dropdowns that are already supported.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: