You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering if there is a rule of thumb on when to adjust for small or unequal sample sizes in betadisper? I guess small sample size depends on the context of the study, but not sure how big the difference in sample sizes between groups has to be to warrant bias adjustment?
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Bias adjustment is √[n/(n – 1)], where n is the group size (see ?betadisper). If n is large, the adjustment is nearly 1 and does not adjust results in any way. For n = 5, adjustment is 1.12, and for n = 20 it is 1.03. You may either ponder whether you need to use this adjustment, or you can always use it: it does not change the results if it doesn't matter, and it matters only if it changed the results. See the paper cited in the help page (Stier et al., 2013).
I don't remember why bias adjustment was not made default — it was back in 2012. Perhaps to have the same default as the old function and the one used in other software, or because the method was still unpublished when it was implemented in vegan. Perhaps @bbolker remembers (and perhaps he gives his recommendation of the default argument – and I would follow).
Hi,
I was wondering if there is a rule of thumb on when to adjust for small or unequal sample sizes in
betadisper
? I guess small sample size depends on the context of the study, but not sure how big the difference in sample sizes between groups has to be to warrant bias adjustment?Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: