Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade babel-eslint from 8.2.3 to 10.1.0 #58

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MooXo
Copy link

@MooXo MooXo commented Feb 3, 2024

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • package.json
    • package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
critical severity 786/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 9.3
Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs
SNYK-JS-BABELTRAVERSE-5962462
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 586/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-LODASH-1018905
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 681/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.2
Command Injection
SNYK-JS-LODASH-1040724
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 686/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.3
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-450202
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 731/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 8.2
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-567746
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 686/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.3
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-608086
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 686/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.3
Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-LODASH-73638
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 541/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 4.4
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-LODASH-73639
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: babel-eslint The new version differs by 41 commits.
  • 4bd049e 10.1.0
  • 2c754a8 Update Babel to ^7.7.0 and enable Flow enums parsing (#812)
  • 183d13e 10.0.3
  • 354953d fix: require eslint dependencies from eslint base (#794)
  • 48f6d78 10.0.2
  • 0241b48 removed unused file reference (#773)
  • 4cf0a21 10.0.1
  • 98c1f13 Revert #584 (#697)
  • 8f78e28 10.0.0
  • 717fba7 test value should be switched
  • 020d012 Treat type alias declarationlike function declaration (#584)
  • b400cb1 Test eslint5, update peerDep (#690)
  • c333bd6 Drop old monkeypatching behavior (#689)
  • 6aa8b6f 9.0.0
  • c7ee9ae Bump to [email protected] 🎉 (#676)
  • 3ece549 Docs: Make the default parserOptions more explicit (#673)
  • 0b36951 Add logical assignment plugin (#674)
  • 5856ff5 Bump some devDeps
  • 45938d9 build(deps): upgrade @ babel/* to 7.0.0-rc.2 (#668)
  • bc97875 9.0.0-beta.3
  • 74c5d62 update lock
  • 6a45632 chore - fixing eslint-scope to a safe version; resolves #656. (#657)
  • e0119e0 9.0.0-beta.2
  • 198964b Merge pull request #645 from rubennorte/support-new-flow-syntax-in-scope-analysis

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Command Injection
🦉 Prototype Pollution

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants