Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Matching Loop Detection Issues #71

Open
2 tasks
JonasAlaif opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
2 tasks

Matching Loop Detection Issues #71

JonasAlaif opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@JonasAlaif
Copy link
Collaborator

JonasAlaif commented Nov 20, 2024

A tracking issue for any logfiles for which the current ML algo fails to construct a graph.

Seq_append(SIN, [⭐ → Seq_take(⭐, SUB)])
Seq_append(SIN, Seq_take([⭐ → Seq_take(⭐, SUB)], Seq_sub([⭐ → Seq_add(Seq_sub(⭐, LEN), LEN)], LEN)))
Seq_append(SIN, Seq_take(Seq_take([⭐ → Seq_take(⭐, SUB)], Seq_sub([⭐ → Seq_add(Seq_sub(⭐, LEN), LEN)], LEN)), Seq_sub(Seq_add(SUB, LEN), LEN)))
// A simplified sequence would be
g(x, y)
g(g(x, y), z)
g(g(g(x, y), z), z)
  • File rewrite_at_yield.smt2 results in rewrite_at_yield.log. Or a real world example is here (from carbon):
    ListIterator.11.log. The issue is that z3 rewrites yielded terms using equalities before the yield (enode creation during instantiation) is logged, and doesn't log this rewrite in any way. Therefore the dependency on the equality is lost and the chain seems like a ML since there are no new facts coming in.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant