Multiple reviewers setting study status independently

[rmfalcao]

Hi,

It would be very cool if the tool allowed reviewers to set the status of each study independently, meaning that Reviewer A could for example accept a certain study, whereas Reviewers B could reject. In such a case, it would be clear in the tool that there was no consensus, and reviewers could act accordingly.

In other words: the status would be an attribute of the revision performed by a reviewer, instead of an attribute of the study.

What do you think?

[vitorfs]

Hi @rmfalcao
Thanks for submitting this issue! We are currently looking into it
I think this is going to be a nice addition to the platform

[A-Infor]

It would be very cool if the tool allowed reviewers to set the status of each study independently, meaning that Reviewer A could for example accept a certain study, whereas Reviewers B could reject. In such a case, it would be clear in the tool that there was no consensus, and reviewers could act accordingly.

In other words: the status would be an attribute of the revision performed by a reviewer, instead of an attribute of the study.

The current limitation is mentioned on this 2020 video https://www.youtube.com/live/u3TYaJpJwEA?feature=share&t=2490 produced by the "Universidade Federal Fluminense".

[A-Infor]

What do you think?

I think it would be a great, and necessary improvement!
Although I'm doing my Systematic Literature Review alone and not needing this feature right now.