Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add completions for go and rust tools #180

Open
EmilyGraceSeville7cf opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Add completions for go and rust tools #180

EmilyGraceSeville7cf opened this issue Dec 12, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
feature-request A requested enhancement help wanted

Comments

@EmilyGraceSeville7cf
Copy link

EmilyGraceSeville7cf commented Dec 12, 2023

I possibly can implement it, but don't guarantee I will do it quickly.

@chrisant996 chrisant996 added enhancement Planned enhancement help wanted labels Mar 10, 2024
@chrisant996 chrisant996 added feature-request A requested enhancement and removed enhancement Planned enhancement labels Jul 3, 2024
@saumyajyoti
Copy link

It might be covered if we implement chrisant996/clink-gizmos#11

@chrisant996
Copy link
Collaborator

It might be covered if we implement chrisant996/clink-gizmos#11

That issue has a misunderstanding about how parsers work and/or about how different the help layout and syntax is for different programs.

It isn't really possible to make a generic parser that magically handles all programs' help text without knowing anything specific about the programs or their help text formatting.

It's not like you can write a magic parser and then suddenly arbitrary programs get completion support.

@saumyajyoti
Copy link

Hi @chrisant996 ,
Understood. What I meant to say is the go , rustup and cargo help text format is same as requested in chrisant996/clink-gizmos#11. So, we may write some common help parser to handle such programs , definitely it is much complex compared to what current auto_argmatcher can do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request A requested enhancement help wanted
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants