Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Negatable.java:32-36: Do we need the 'Negatable'... #85

Open
0pdd opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Negatable.java:32-36: Do we need the 'Negatable'... #85

0pdd opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
refactoring Improve the code without changing logic

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented Nov 11, 2024

The puzzle 1-4218ade7 from #1 has to be resolved:

* @todo #1:90min Do we need the 'Negatable' interface?
* We use many 'instance of' checks to determine if the element is negatable.
* Maybe we should use the visitor pattern instead?
* Or something else? Current implementation produces many 'instance of' checks,
* which is not a good practice.

The puzzle was created by @volodya-lombrozo on 11-Nov-24.

Estimate: 90 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactoring Improve the code without changing logic
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants