-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 27
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mapping of poster #277
Comments
I tend to agree that there should be a way for information from a poster image, or the default frame a video element displays, to be relayed to AT if necessary. However, i'm not sure i agree that the poster attribute itself requires a mapping. Especially without a means to provide alternative text to the displayed visual, what benefit is there in indicating that a 'poster' rather than a still frame is displayed? If a poster-like image were the first frame of the actual video and that was displayed, we'd still have the issue of potentially important information not being relayed to users. I think the answer here is that |
I agree that the role "poster" is not relevant, but the information of the poster image may be relevant in rare cases and there is currently no way I know of to transmit it (unless it is written as text below the video element) |
Agreed, there is no current way to relay the information of an image the With that said, here's a discussion from the W3C HTML repo about this topic. Maybe some of the history that is linked to in that thread, or the recommendations this be renewed over at the WICG Discourse, could be where to go next? I'm going to close this issue as there's no benefit in mapping the Thanks |
The poster attribute can be used to display an image instead of the video. The image need not be identical to an image from the video. The poster attribute currently has no mapping. Should it not be recognizable with AT:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: