From 296ca5506a34e6b640695b8f76bb8291d43a90f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adam Langley <agl@chromium.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:30:06 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Mark SPK's `signatures` output as required.

AuthenticationExtensionsSupplementalPubKeysOutputs.signatures should
always be present in the client extension outputs since it's the only
field and SPK makes no sense without the signatures.
---
 index.bs | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/index.bs b/index.bs
index bcd25ceb2..5794c0a99 100644
--- a/index.bs
+++ b/index.bs
@@ -7253,7 +7253,7 @@ The weight that [=[RPS]=] give to the presence of a signature from a supplementa
 :: A sequence of {{ArrayBuffer}}s containing the signatures returned as the [=unsigned extension output=].
     <xmp class="idl">
     dictionary AuthenticationExtensionsSupplementalPubKeysOutputs {
-        sequence<ArrayBuffer> signatures;
+        required sequence<ArrayBuffer> signatures;
     };
 
     partial dictionary AuthenticationExtensionsClientOutputs {