Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 29, 2021. It is now read-only.

Sword enhancing #115

Open
Ret1nic opened this issue Apr 23, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Sword enhancing #115

Ret1nic opened this issue Apr 23, 2019 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug A failure in the project that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected result. can't reproduce Reported by users but the maintainer is unable to reproduce.

Comments

@Ret1nic
Copy link

Ret1nic commented Apr 23, 2019

What behaviour is observed:

When enhancing my sword, (it already had sharpness 5, knockback 2, fire aspect 2, sweeping edge 3, looting 3, unbreaking 3, mending,) it didn't enhance the sharpness levels, it instead enhanced it to have ban of arthropod 5 , smite 5, looting 5 and a higher lvl fire aspect. Everyone else on the server enhancing swords, had their swords get higher lvl sharpness, whereas I am the only one having this happen

Steps to reproduce:

I have no idea why its happening, just that i simply tried enhancing the sword.

Plugin list:

._EssentialsX-2.16.1.0
._EssentialsXChat-2.16.1.0
._EssentialsXGeoIP-2.16.1.0
._EssentialsXXMPP-2.16.1.0
EnchantmentsEnhance-Plugin-7.2.0
EssentialsXChat-2.16.1.0
EssentialsXGeoIP-2.16.1.0
EssentialsXXMPP-2.16.1.0
Factions
FactionsShop
GroupManager
MassiveCore
Vault
mcMMO
ssafetrade-1.1.0

Environment description

Spigot 1.13.2

Enchantments Enhance build number:

v7.20

Error Log:

Not applicable

@weihao weihao self-assigned this Apr 23, 2019
@weihao weihao added the bug A failure in the project that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected result. label May 7, 2019
@weihao weihao added the can't reproduce Reported by users but the maintainer is unable to reproduce. label May 24, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
bug A failure in the project that causes it to produce an incorrect or unexpected result. can't reproduce Reported by users but the maintainer is unable to reproduce.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants