Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cifa10 accuracies #5

Open
a-maci opened this issue May 8, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

cifa10 accuracies #5

a-maci opened this issue May 8, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@a-maci
Copy link

a-maci commented May 8, 2017

When executed (python cifar10_train.py --version='test') with the given hyper-params, I get the following top1 accuracies:

Train top1 error = 0.0078125
Validation top1 error = 0.1641
Validation loss = 0.650083

The validation error of 16.41% is way off the 3.65% number mentioned in the paper (Table 7).
Any idea of what is going wrong?

@a3551571
Copy link

excuse me.I met the same problem as you.Did you solve the problem?
I haved tried 4 ways to run the code

'python cifar10_train.py --version='test''
'python cifar10_train.py --version='test',num_resnext_blocks=3,cardinality=4'
'python cifar10_train.py --version='test',num_resnext_blocks=3,cardinality=8'
'python cifar10_train.py --version='test',num_resnext_blocks=2,cardinality=64'

The validation error is still about 16%

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants