Replies: 4 comments
-
@jmesnil The 4.x option is fine with me. I don't usually create a maintenance branch until it's needed, but I've got no strong opinion there either. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
We should bump the dependency on Galleon to 5.0.0.Final. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
FYI I've filed https://issues.redhat.com/browse/WFMP-155 and I'm working on a PR now that will move to 4.0.0.Alpha1-SNAPSHOT and require Java 11. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
I am working on integrating a library to the plugin and the JDK8 jobs are failing because the lib targets Java 11.
While looking at this, I wonder if and when the plugin could switch to Java 11.
WildFly made the switch for its upcoming 27 release. This will also have an impact on the plugin as it incorporates artifacts from the
org.wildfly.core
groupId that will require Java 11.Right now, the plugin is still using a previous release of WildFly Core:
wildfly-maven-plugin/pom.xml
Line 97 in aacffac
When the plugin will use artifacts from upcoming WildFLy Core 19, it will have to make the switch to Java 11.
I wonder how we will make that switch. I see different alternatives:
My preference would be to bump to 4.x before making the JDK 11 switch. This seems the most logical approach and matches semantic versioning.
@jamezp Do you have any input on this?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions