Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
Thanks for reaching out! I personally find some of the ongoing efforts to simplify the CPython API a little misguided (especially when it comes to functions always returning strong references). I have added some feedback to the form to clarify what I mean by this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
-
For anyone following along, there is now a wider effort for mapping out C API issues at: https://github.com/capi-workgroup/problems/issues |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I'm figuring out a strategy for the future of Python's C-API, and as one of the goals I'd like to make it friendly for non-C languages. But since I mostly deal with C & Python, I'd like to ask you for any suggestions, pain points or comments on how do better to that.
Would you like to help?
I started a Google doc to collect notes, please feel free to comment there, or here, or suggest a better place.
Would it be better to ask one of nanobind's predecessors?
Thank you for your time!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions